Copyright Protects Software Most people believe that copyright law protects paintings, poems, and books. Here are the major elements you must establish to prove infringement: you are the lawful owner of all or part of a work protected by a valid copyright one or more of your copyright rights has been infringed, and the person, partnership, or corporation being sued has actually done the infringing act or contributed to it is what's called a "contributory infringer".
Ownership of a Work Protected by Copyright The question of infringement does not even arise unless the work allegedly infringed is protected by copyright. This means that the work must be: Fixed in a tangible medium of expression. A work is sufficiently fixed if it exists on paper, on disk, or even just in computer RAM. It does not need to be "physical" in the same way as a painting or a novel.
Independently created. You cannot sue someone for copying software or other materials that you copied from others. Minimally creative. The work you believe has been infringed upon must have been the product of at least a minimal amount of creativity. The vast majority of software easily satisfies this requirement; but some databases may not. Infringement of Your Copyright Rights As a practical matter, most cases of software copyright infringement involve a violation of the owner's exclusive right to make copies.
This means that in most cases you must prove two things to establish infringement: that the claimed infringer had access to your work, and that the infringing work is substantially similar to your work.
Proving Access to Your Work To prove access, you must show that the alleged infringer had the opportunity to view and copy your software. Proving Substantial Similarity to Your Work Proving substantial similarity is usually the crux of any copyright infringement case, particularly in the software context.
Will Your Claim of Infringement Succeed? Talk to a Lawyer Need a lawyer? Start here. Practice Area Please select Zip Code. How it Works Briefly tell us about your case Provide your contact information Choose attorneys to contact you. Intellectual Property Law. Are you creating a derivative work that subtracts value from the original artist? The artist and the AP press came to a private settlement in January , part of which included a split in the profits for the work.
Credit, credit, credit! On 99designs you cannot use licensed work — but in the right circumstances you can use stock imagery. When doing so, make sure everyone knows the source. Richard Prince is a well known appropriation artist — one who transforms the work of others to create new meaning in his own work. For an exhibition in the Gagosian Gallery, Prince appropriated 41 images from a photography book by French photographer Patrick Cariou, claiming fair use that he created new meaning out of the photographs.
However, the case is currently in appeal and the final decision has not yet been reached. The initial ruling in this case in favor of Cariou has created huge divisions in the artistic community.
The jury is still out on this one. You have to make sure you are creating something original and not derivative. Read more about the decision as well as the 5 pieces which are still under review by a lower court in The New York Times and Hyperallergic. Seattle design firm Modern Dog utilized a series of sketches of dogs in their compendium put out by Chronicle Books in The Modern Dog case has brought to light a question burning in the mind of many designers and artists — what happens if a major corporation with many more resources than me, utilizes my artwork for profit?
Always defend your designs. Cornell could also lose its eligibility for discount pricing on software. In the larger picture, copying cheats the publisher and everyone who uses the software. It makes software more costly and denies the publisher the sales it needs and earned to improve software and finance new projects.
Violations are reported more often than you might think, through honest employees and students, routine software audits, technology support professionals, network administrators, software publishers, and piracy watchdog groups. Your work computer is university property. So is your connection to the Internet via the campus network.
Cornell is committed to making sure that its computers run legally licensed software, and that its network is not supporting software copyright infringement in any form. Report their actions. That policy will protect you from your co-workers and anyone else who might be upset by your honesty: "The university will not tolerate retaliation toward or harassment of employees who report actual or possible violations. The identity of individuals providing information concerning possible violations, including fraud, will be protected within legal limits.
So tell your technology support professional or administrative managers what is happening, in as much detail as you can. If that seems awkward or inappropriate, contact University Audit , University Counsel , or Cornell Information Technologies When students are involved, notify the Judicial Administrator Day Hall, Unless otherwise stated in the software license, the only copy you can legally make is one archival backup of the original installation disks or CD, to be used only if the original ones fail.
Also, check The Cornell Store's educational pricing. When shopping outside Cornell, ask for educational and volume-discount pricing. Ask the technology support professional in your office or department. This person will know what software is site-licensed and what software has been purchased and can remove anything else. Compile as many purchase orders, receipts, vendor reports and license agreements as possible. Original disks and manuals are usually not adequate proof.
Then follow University Audit's suggestions for better record-keeping. Institute a departmental strategy for acquiring software and designate a person to oversee purchasing and installation. Keep all proofs of purchase e. Remove all software from equipment that is being discarded, sold, or donated. Yes, if it was obtained through Tech Connect or Procurement Services. If your computer came from another source, review the licenses and documentation to verify the software's legitimacy.
If you're buying a used computer, all installed software should come with license agreements, registration, and original installation disks and manuals. Remove any software that you can't verify. Several of the other justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, suggested they were sympathetic to Oracle's copyright claims. Still, they appeared reluctant to rule in Oracle's favor because of arguments made by leading computer scientists and Microsoft , in friend-of-the-court briefs, that doing so could upend the industry.
Several of the court's conservatives, including Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito, noted that Google's allies had warned that the "sky will fall" if Oracle won. But those comments were also peppered with skepticism. Justice Neil Gorsuch also repeatedly raised questions about whether a lower court that sided with Oracle was sufficiently deferential to a jury's finding in favor of Google, suggesting the top court could send the case back without a definitive ruling.
The case was among the first to be heard by the Supreme Court in its term, which began Monday, and also among the first to be heard since Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died last month. Based on her prior writings, Ginsburg was expected to side with Oracle in the matter.
Arguments were conducted by telephone and streamed live to the public as a result of the Covid pandemic. The dueling conceptions of the code at issue fueled much of the legal dispute. Google's attorney Thomas Goldstein stressed during arguments that the company had written all of the code that could be expressed differently from the way that Oracle had done.
0コメント